Building research capacity
Seed-supported work focused on computing and prototyping resources, AI/data practice, sensing and simulation planning, and additive-manufacturing research. That foundation helps SBX choose and prepare the next physical experiment.
The $75,000 seed grant followed a separate $25,000 R&D voucher for the completed Montclair project. Together, the two New Jersey CSIT awards supported feasibility and pre-commercial development.
Why intake comes next
A circular-recovery system depends on the decision at its entrance. The next proposed study asks whether capture quality and complementary physical evidence can guide optional testing across unfamiliar module lots, before expanding downstream processes.
From capacity to a testable workflow
- Specify repeatable capture conditions and distinguish acquisition artifacts from module-condition evidence.
- Agree mandatory safety procedures and independent condition/function reference assessments with qualified specialists.
- Compare operator practice, an efficient fixed workflow, an established adaptive method and the proposed PV-specific policy at matched error and coverage limits.
The next investment decision
The comparison will test whether optional acquisition improves complete cost at acceptable routing errors and decision coverage across held-out source lots. Simpler methods remain preferable if they match the candidate. Protocol, module access, specialist work and prospective timing must be costed before physical validation.
Continue into the architecture.
See how this work informs the next research question.
Explore operator economics